joebob051977 Posted October 9, 2007 Share Posted October 9, 2007 Ok, Let's get down and dirty. The polls are even between doubles and triples so let's talk money. What do your machines average? 2 head: Revenue VS 3 head: Revenue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigel44 Posted October 9, 2007 Share Posted October 9, 2007 Whoa...hold back fellas.......not everybody at once.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joebob051977 Posted October 10, 2007 Author Share Posted October 10, 2007 I can't believe there are so few responses. Everyone has an opinion as to which one they prefer, I just want to know if the extra head is worth the extra money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caserri Posted October 11, 2007 Share Posted October 11, 2007 Sorry, I've been out of town a couple days still catching up! I do not run triples so I can't comment on doubles vs triples however I can throw in my 2 cents on doubles vs singles. I think, but could be wrong, that the same philosophy would hold true. My singles rarely make as much as my doubles do total. However, my singles make more than any one head on a double. This is why I am converting to all (or mostly) singles. You can read more about that HERE. That 2nd head just seems like dead weight to me when it could be making more on its own. I would imagine that would hold true in your scenario as well. Meaning, You will make more money off of your double than you will make off 2 heads in a triple setup. Yes, your total on a triple should be more than a double due to volume but your average per head will be lower. I just want every head I have taking in the most they can. Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joebob051977 Posted October 11, 2007 Author Share Posted October 11, 2007 Ditto. I want to be efficient and effectivie. I don't want to spend extra money on a head that won't pull its weight. I started off on the 3 head bandwagon and am starting to waiver and join the other team. 2 heads means less money to put more machines out there. I am concerned that a 3rd head would bring in a little extra money, but not enough to justify the expense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KPower Posted October 11, 2007 Share Posted October 11, 2007 This is a tough call but in an actual cage fight Triples would be very heavy and hard to swing effectively. They would pack a huge wallop thoughbut the added weight would also wear you out quicker. I personally would go for the doublehead for the lighter weight and flexibility of movement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbo Posted October 12, 2007 Share Posted October 12, 2007 my triples - 18 doubles - 22.50 I find doubles easier, better visability. Jimbo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now